Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2832Abstract
The increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of the historical causes and courses of inter-group conflict in current comparative approaches. Meta-analytic methods offer researchers the ability to combine data from studies with groups as well as across time. Our review of statistical methods available for comparative analyses in inter-group research found strengths and limitations for understanding group differences, conflict, and violence, and meta-analytic methods address these limitations by exploring potential structural-level moderators and by identifying how temporal and geographical variations may relate directly to group-based variables. Such methods can contribute to our understanding of broad structural effects on group-based variables by elucidating the mechanisms underlying them.Downloads
Published
2010-11-15
How to Cite
Tan, J. Y. R., Huedo-Medina, T. B., Lennon, C. A., White, A. C., & Johnson, B. T. (2010). Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(2), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2832
Issue
Section
Open Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Conflict and Violence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.